Now that we have covered the fundamentals let’s get back to the topic! What is the difference between apt and apt-get? So let us begin by having a little fun and uncover the true nature of the command line interface! The rest of this article is dedicated to those of you in the first steps of your journey to becoming a Linux master! You can remember which is which by thinking “ apt” is shorter to type as compared to “ apt-get” and hence “ apt” is more useful in the command-line interface where we have to type things manually every time!ĭon’t worry if the above answer does not make sense to you as that was targeted at more experienced programmers who just wanted to refresh their memories. The table below highlights their differences What is the difference between the commands “ apt update” and “ apt-get update“? Both these commands are used to download and update the package information from all of the configured sources, the difference is “apt-get” is old and is meant to be used with scripts while “apt” is newer and meant to be used in the command line interface. when to use apt update and when to use apt-get update?įor those of you who are in a hurry, here is the short version of the answer! “apt update” vs “apt-get update”: In a Nutshell!.What is the difference in terms of functionality?.In particular, we will try to answer the following questions in this article. Packages will never be removed.In this article, let us learn what differentiates the 2 very similar commands “apt update” and “apt-get update”. New packages will be installed if required to satisfy dependencies, but existing Upgrade is used to install available upgrades of all packages currently installed on the system from the sourcesĬonfigured via sources.list(5). perform package upgrades or search in and display details about all packages available for installation. Other commands operate on this data toĮ.g. Update is used to download package information from all configured sources. Much like apt itself, its manpage is intended as an end user interface and as such only mentions the most used commandsĪnd options partly to not duplicate information in multiple places and partly to avoid overwhelming readers with a Interface and enables some options better suited for interactive usage by default compared to more specialized APT tools There is zero harm in doing so.Īpt provides a high-level commandline interface for the package management system. It is what Discover/Gnome Software/packagekit use under the hood, and is how Ubuntu was set up to use. Most of the time, running the latter in Ubuntu is just fine, but there will be times when this won't install all the updates, just like the old apt-get upgrade would not, but not to the extreme.įor people who use PPAs, and particularly Kubuntu users who use their Backports and/or Updates PPAs, if you don't use full-upgrade you won't get all the new deps, and many packages won't be installed, and thus creating conflicts and breakages. Ubuntu uses apt full-upgrade over simply apt upgrade. Now, with the move to plain 'apt', there still is a difference. just as the command would seem to indicate. apt-get dist-upgradewas the correct way to install updates in Ubuntu, while on Debian, it was part of the methods used to upgrade that distro to a newer release. Using apt-get upgrade in Ubuntu would not install all the available updates and their new dependencies, whereas in Debian this was the correct usage, as there would not be new dependencies, by design. This was more prominent back when apt-get was the norm. The confusions come from the differences between how Debian and Ubuntu updates happen. Now, in recent years, the command has changed, from the old apt-get to just apt You need to use both, as they do different things.Īpt full-upgrade install the updates found from apt update.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |